BREAKING: Supreme Court That Blocked Vaccine Mandates & Quarantine Orders Suddenly VERY Concerned About Immunity.
Justices display deep concern for criminal defendants as long as the criminal defendant is Donald Trump and only Donald Trump.
(via Image Generator)
The Supreme Court took some time away from casually musing about whether dictionaries require letting women die on emergency room tables, to consider whether a former president of the United States has blanket, absolute immunity from all crimes committed in office. Or at least all crimes related to “official acts,” which Trump’s counsel suggested would extend to assassinating political rivals.
This is, of course, insane and ground that the Republic thoroughly covered over Nixon.
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
But while some justices see the Constitution as it is and ask, “Why?”, the right-wing of this Court dreams things that never were and ask, “Why not?”
For the record, no, I do not want to “See the latest COVID-19 information on X.” But I’m sure Elon Musk has built a fabulous landing page for Joe Rogan and Aaron Rodgers to share their thoughts. On the other hand, we might have actually discovered something crazier than the hypotheticals on display today.
Sponsored
AI’s Impact On Law Firms Of Every Size
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
Generative AI In Legal Work — What’s Fact And What’s Fiction?
Law Firms Now Have A Choice In Their Document Comparison Software
I stand corrected, oral argument was worse than the COVID freak page.
And while peddling batshit hypotheticals was the mission of the day for Trump’s team, Sauer couldn’t hold a candle to the energy coming from the Court’s right flank.
Ah. Much the same way he thought vaccine mandates were questionably effective, I suppose. In his defense, there were a lot of questions, it’s just that they were all repeatedly and conclusively resolved in Biden’s favor.
Alas, Sam was just getting warmed up:
Sponsored
How Transactional Lawyers Can Better Serve (And Maintain) Their Clients
Law Firms Now Have A Choice In Their Document Comparison Software
WHEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Image via Frinkiac & Getty & my photoshop skills
Unwilling to let Alito have all the fun, Thomas decided to wax philosophic about all the past coups in American history.
Wait, what?
He’s asking about presidents overthrowing foreign governments like Allende in Chile or Árbenz in Guatemala. Personally, I thought that suggesting aid for an international coup would present the same bundle of domestic criminal justice issues as siccing a mob of slack-jawed armed hooligans on the U.S. Capitol would involve levels of mendacity that would give even Thomas pause.
I was wrong about that!
Throughout the argument, conservative justices — particularly Alito — bemoaned the weaponization of law enforcement and the horror of overzealous criminal prosecutors. It’s a new leaf for a gang who routinely rubberstamps death warrants, but don’t worry… this concern for criminal defendants stops at inconveniencing a Republican president:
The Chief, meanwhile, struck a compromise tone. And by “compromise,” we mean “let’s just give Trump what he wants but in a way that doesn’t put a spotlight on us.”
In other words, if we lay low long enough, Trump will either win and pardon himself or Biden will win and we can quickly fire off an “of course presidents can go to jail, silly” opinion. It’s hard to envision which thorny fact issues the court below needs to untangle after Trump’s lawyer conceded to Justice Barrett that most of the indictment deals with private activity that has no immunity argument at all.
But as they say, “life tenure means never having to say you’re sorry.”
Earlier: SCOTUS Conservatives Show Their Whole Asses In Trump Immunity Argument
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.
